ACADEMIC POLICY

Monitoring-and-periodic-evaluation-of-programs

1) Regular monitoring, review and updating of educational programs are aimed at ensuring their effective implementation and creating a favorable learning environment for students.

2) These processes include the assessment of:
  1. content of the educational program in the trends of recent scientific research on specific discipline research to ensure the relevance of the program being taught;
  2. periodically changing needs of society;
  3. academic load, performance and graduation of students;
  4. efficiency of students evaluation procedures;
  5. expectations, requirements, and contentment of students in the educational program;
  6. learning environment, support services and their relevance to the objectives of the educational program.
3) The University provides the participation of students, employers and other stakeholders in the evaluation, revision and updating of educational programs and ensures that the results of these processes are used for continuous improvement.

4) The University ensures that stakeholders are informed of all changes made as a result of evaluation and monitoring of educational programs.

5) The basis for monitoring, analysis and updating of educational programs can be:
  1. amendments in the Regulatory Legal Acts;
  2. amendments/supplements to the National Qualifications Framework, Sectoral Qualifications Framework;
  3. amendments/introduction of new professional standards;
  4. results of quality assessment of the educational program (audit, proposals of the stakeholders, accreditation results, etc.);
  5. research results of the faculty members.
6) Updating of the educational program is carried out in accordance with the established procedure.

7) Assessment of the quality of the educational program by the main stakeholders is implemented through:
  1. satisfaction evaluation of graduates with the educational program and learning environment;
  2. satisfaction evaluation of students with the educational program;
  3. satisfaction evaluation of employers with the quality of training of graduates;
  4. annual data collection and analysis of employment, analysis of career development of graduates.
8) Assessment of academic achievements of students is carried out by means of
  1. analyzing the results of intermediate and final certification;
  2. discussing the results of academic performance at the meetings of collegial bodies;
  3. analyzing the quality of training of students within the work of attestation commissions.
9) When analyzing the learning outcomes, the following are identified:
  1. compliance of assessment criteria with the expected learning outcomes;
  2. compliance of the content of the assessment material with the goals and objectives of the discipline;
  3. efficiency of the assessment procedure.
10) NCJSC “KMU” conducts internal audits to determine whether the processes of planning, organizing, monitoring and developing the quality of educational programs comply with the established requirements.

11) The process of monitoring, evaluation and improvement of educational programs is the area of responsibility of supervisors of educational program.